LINKEDIN CENSORSHIP

11000 followers lost, thousands of links broken and the IMNRC+NCBP+Education+Interface Diagnostics Cabinet (IDC) LinkedIn pages frozen: links broken and interactivity seriously hindered for eight months. [NB. I regained control of the pages in August 2022 but all the interesting articles I posted have disappeared.] LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft. Both are members of the WEF that in turn forms part of the UN+EU+WEF System that seeks to control world society and population through coercive centralised global governance. A new account was created but redirecting and repairing the links requires an army of staff and shall take a very long time. The UN+EU+WEF System and its closed devoted clique of selected academics, scientists, physicians, politicians, civil societies, industries, institutions and organisations shall continue to do everything it can to block our activities. We need your support. This notice shall remain posted during the time it shall take to redirect all the links.

***

This Brochure offers only a abroad outline of the IMNRC's activities for obvious IPR reasons.

***

International Multidisciplinary Neuroscience Research Center

 IMNRC asbl/vzw  

 Directorate

***

***

Founding Executive Director: Professor Vivian R. F. Linssen D.I.

***

 Profile

"I believe in the power of trust in a common referential: achieving and sustaining the well-being and quality of life of eight billion human beings at interconnected personal, family, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels." (Viv)

***

Professor Vivian R. F. Linssen (Viv) is the founding executive director of the International Multidisciplinary Neuroscience Research Centre (IMNRC asbl/vzw). The IMNRC is a private academic research institution (legally registered and recognised in 2002) that has acquired a strong international political and academic reputation in the field of Capacity Building. Its Flagship Project is the New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP: please see below) - also known as the World Society Well Being and Quality of Life Project or the World Citizens' Initiative) - with already 140 countries involved is a ten year programme (hopefully less) blending together Interface Education (Education of Tomorrow), Interface Governance (Governance of Tomorrow), Interface Localities (Smart Cities of Tomorrow), Interface Science (Science of Tomorrow) and Interface Medicine (Medicine of Tomorrow) offering an alternative to the UN+EU+WEF System and based on a listening instead of a coercive society.

A leitmotive in Viv's life was: "How and why do we understand?" This question intrigued him even as a child, but what fascinated him even more was the direct correlation between the quality of understanding (receptivity, depth, rapidity of data processing, natural versus imposed, aconceptual versus conceptual, holistic/integrated versus fragmented, non-linear versus linear, vertical as opposed to horizontal) and the mindset (state of mind). The latter determines the former. "Perhaps this is the Missing Link that is so needed to enable an integrated understanding of the Cosmos and reconcile the disparate notions of "energy", amongst other issues... " says Viv. "If so, this ultimate element to solving The Great Puzzle has been staring at us in the face for thousands of years without our being aware of it. Makes you wonder..." And Viv to continue: “There is a need to optimise the state of mind (mindset) for complex avant-garde holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing. Understand what “is” an “interface”, what understands an interface and how, and you could in principle understand anything.”

Even though Viv has a musical, philosophical, scientific and medical background, the only degree he recognises as of any practical value is the D.I. from the IMNRC where he is both Professor of Interfaces and Principal Coordinator of the NewPOL Network. He definitely does NOT wish to have any specific (fragmented) traditional academic qualification (or label) attached to his name. "A job or suffix or title puts you in a category that I find unpleasantly stigmatising, reducing the human being to a skill or qualification. In every human being whether he or she is living in a back slum in Montevideo or trying to survive somewhere in Africa there is a latent Leonardo Da Vinci. The human being has far more potential than what his/her existing occupation or qualifications would lead one to believe. I am just a Professor of Interfaces. Period." Viv says. "The Interface is all you need to understand and therein you shall find all the knowledge you need. Of course this means the collapse of the existing educational system worldwide." See 1. Mainstream Education: A Totalitarian Ineffective System 2. The International Interface Research Centre (IIRC): Open Call

Asked why he doesn't publish in peer reviewed articles/papers, Viv replies: "Well, first my work doesn't fit in any unidisciplinary or pseudo-interdisciplinary publication (peer reviewed or not), second there are no peer reviewed papers/articles on interfaces to publish in simply because there are no peers in interfaces to review them in the first place (indeed, there are no peers in "interfaces") and lastly, publishing has never been a priority. Had I spent my time publishing I would never have had the time to create the IMNRC and taken part in parallel activities. Even though I agree that it may be convenient, please bear in mind that publishing is not a token of quality or originality. Some researchers in universities/research institutions do have a tendency to consider themselves Einsteins just because they have published articles: these are the worst and lack the spiritual dimension/personality to become top flight scientists."

The list of Viv's achievements and track record is quite impressive:

The following were hijacked and brutally replaced by the UN+EU+WEF System's Covid-19 Official Narrative that imposed its own understanding and treatment of Sarscov-2/Covid-19 on the medical and scientific profession and civil society, denigrating any alternatives and threatening, blackmailing and slandering anyone who thought otherwise:

The following were directly inspired from the IMNRC and/or the NCBP without the slightest recognition:

Viv has been: 

He shall again be an Independent Candidate for the 2024 European Commission Presidency ( I am Candidate for the EC Presidency 2024. What does this imply? ).

Viv also practises Tai Chi Chuan, classical, jazz and ballroom dancing, likes travelling, cycling, long walks in the mountains (or in the woods), the sea and visiting museums. He is especially fond of surrealism and loves sushi! He is on Facebook and Twitter. A public profile is also available on Google.

Selection of publications:  

Professor Vivian R. F. Linssen D.I.

Founding Executive Director

International Multidisciplinary Neuroscience Research Center a.s.b.l./v.z.w.

Principal Coordinator

NewPOL Consortium Network

Jesus-Eiklaan 120

BE-3080 Tervuren

BELGIUM

Tel/Fax: +3227681730

Twitter: @VivianLinssen

e-mail 1: vivian.linssen@imnrc.org

e-mail 2: viv@infodiagnosis.com

url 1: www.imnrc.org (Draft)

url 2: www.infodiagnosis.com

LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/professor-vivian-r-f-linssen-d-i-633858230/

Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/vivian.linssen

**************************************************************************  

English Version (Word) (update pending)

We are basically interested in interfaces. An interface is what is between... and since interfaces are not only omnipresent but also the interconnecting principle that integrates the infinitesimally small with the infinitesimally large, understanding interfaces requires a fundamental state of mind (or mindset) revolution. This means unlearning and relearning, optimising the state of mind (or mindset) for complex holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing, something that the existing education does not provide. This Interface Mindset has the potential to set up a universal algorithm using a common language - the interface - that elegantly articulates the multitude of fragmented parts of the “Universe” together. The Interface is the language of the universe.

The Interface Paradigm elegantly illustrates the fundamental natural interconnectedness between all “things” - interfaces - in the Universe and how by creating an artificial yet convincing discontinuity, replacing it by a conceptual interconnectedness thereby confusing the orders of abstraction and losing him/herself in a conceptual maze, the Human Being is leading civilisation - and Planet Earth - to its doom.  

The interface is not only an extraordinarily powerful investigating tool, it is probably the key to understanding the Universe including therefore the Life Sciences and ourselves.  

Applications of Interfaces are multiple, ranging from fundamental research to new governance.

The International Multidisciplinary Neuroscience Research Centre (IMNRC asbl/vzw) is a legally recognised institution/organisation since 2002 (Belgian Monitor) based in Tervuren, Flemish Brabant, Belgium.  

The IMNRC is atypical and very avant-garde because it functions thanks to a vast international consortium, a worldwide web (or network) of collaborators. The IMNRC administrative and residential HQ located in Tervuren, near Brussels doesn't have any laboratories because it doesn't need them. Indeed, all the laboratory, medical, scientific and technological facilities are provided by the international consortium in their respective countries and locations. Instructions come from the IMNRC that monitors progress from afar. This kind of futuristic organisation would have not been possible without internet. 

The IMNRC does not recognise and in fact rejects the Enic-Naric System (network) because despotic, obsolete and outdated. The Enic-Naric System shall be replaced by the World Competence Audit (WCA). The IMNRC has a completely different vision of science and medicine (in fact of education and the global "World System" altogether) that has been for a long time (with a few exceptions) ignored by peers. Now, with the increasing recognition of the importance of a holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary approach (i.e. an interface approach, see below) to research and everyday life from personal and family concerns to world challenges, there has been a progressive mindset change and a growing recognition of the IMNRC's activities. The belated "discovery" of the microbiome, the catastrophic management of the Covid-19 Pandemic and of world politics are three vivid examples that highlighted the limits of our educational system and our civilisation's incapacity to deal with global complexity. Time to look elsewhere.   

A. Scope of activities:  

1. The New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP). The NCBP strives to BUILD our civilisation's CAPACITY to understand and therefore manage the increasing complexities of an ever changing world. In other words, understand Global Complexity in order to achieve and sustain the well-being and quality of life of eight billion interconnected human beings at personal, interpersonal, family, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels, the Third Millennium’s Top Priority. This is the IMNRC’s Flagship Project also known as the "World Society Well-Being and Quality of Life Programme" or "World Citizens' Initiative (WCI)."  The NCBP is a systemic programme that integrates all the IMNRC's activities together.

1. Introduction

2. The NCBP Task Force

3. The SDGs

4. The World Economic Forum: The Great Reset & New World Order

5. The World Covid Crisis

6. The Future

7. Funding

    i. Introduction

     The World is not going well. There already was a serious world existential and trust crisis before Covid-19 that the latter has exacerbated leading to perhaps the worst pandemic of all times: the loss of trust, with serious immediate/medium/long term consequences. Understanding and managing global complexity in an ever changing world is still outside our civilisation's competence. This is largely due to an obsolete, outdated educational system that is still mainstream because of powerful politico-financial vested interests. A fundamental mindset revolution (mindset reset), educational revolution and governance revolution - in this order - is urgently needed. How? The NCBP by Building the human beings' Capacity to deal with global complexity.                                    

     Despite receiving billions, the UN+EU(+WEF) System has to this day never been able to succeed in either sustainably preventing or solving any of the fifty interconnected global challenges our civilisation has been faced with so far. So the World Covid-19 Crisis was to be expected. If you reflect a little however, one may well wonder: "Never able to or never wanting to succeed?" Indeed, the UN+EU(+WEF) System knows perfectly well that it is not configured to manage the well-being and quality of life of eight billion human beings, the Third Millennium's Top Priority. I suspect that the UN+EU(+WEF) System doesn’t want to find sustainable solutions because it wouldn’t be needed anymore. ..which is why it blocks any initiative that can succeed where it has consistently failed. This has been the case for the NCBP. The UN+EU+WEF System is not only inefficient, arrogant and shockingly expensive to run, it is also toxic for our civilisation. It should therefore be dismantled and integrated in a highly interactive New Global Governance Infrastructure set up with and not imposed on the world population based on mutual trust in a common referential: achieving and sustaining the well-being and quality of life of eight billion interconnected human beings at personal, interpersonal, family, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels. This is the NCBP. 

     Considering the above and the UN+EU(+WEF) System's global inefficiency and incompetence, arrogance and how shockingly expensive it is to run, the NCBP has been increasingly recognised as a viable alternative. 

The NCBP provides a platform that guarantees a stable resilient political structure worldwide.

------

     I have been attending many meetings throughout the years involving nearly all the countries worldwide thereby creating an impressive network. My role in such events is to help – which as some have already found out doesn’t necessarily mean being “nice”: this is what a friend is for – by questioning academic certainties, encouraging holistic cross-disciplinary thinking, offering suggestions and solutions, giving advice and inviting some to look in a mirror: the institutions (EU and non EU), politicians, academics, civil society, ourselves... i.e. the human being him/herself whatever his/her background and socio-economic status.

Our civilisation has enormous potential but it has great difficulty harnessing this potential constructively because of (i) the loss of trust that has both led to and enforced fragmentation and individualism; (ii) the complexity of the political (cultural, constitutional, legal, religious, educational, societal, ...) landscape and (iii) chronic internal dysfunctions. Leaders shall never accept to be led by other leaders. On the other hand, there shouldn't be too much difficulty reaching a consensus regarding the Third Millennium's Top Priority which is achieving and sustaining the citizens' well being and quality of life in world society. This requires global trust and solidarity: basically, a mindset issue. 

It is the mindset that artificially but very convincingly fragments a preexisting natural interconnectedness between all "things" (interfaces) in the Universe. The state of mind / mindset determines the way you process - collect, assimilate, understand, articulate - data together, whatever the data. Diversity can lead to either constructive exchanges or destructive confrontations. The "interface" that decides is... the mindset/state of mind. There is therefore the need to optimise the state of mind/mindset for complex avant-garde holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing. This is what we refer to as the Interface Mindset (see The Education of Tomorrow below). Now the "interface" is a multiple-edged sword. It is therefore necessary to add a referential: the citizens' happiness. The above can thus be rephrased in the following way: there is a need to optimise the state of mind/mindset for complex avant-garde holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing in order to achieve and sustain the eight billion human beings' well being and quality of life at interconnected personal, interpersonal, family, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels.  

This is the New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP). Capacity Building can be understood in many different ways. The meaning we ascribe to New Capacity Building is optimising the human being's capacity to deal with the holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary (i.e. interface) challenges of an ever changing world: Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin and North America, Canada, the Middle East, Oceania all together. 

A leitmotiv in this introduction is this rather abstract notion of "interface". Understanding an "interface" is central to understanding the NCBP. So it may be a good idea to refresh the reader's memory with a little history. The normal sequence leading to the NCBP should have been: the 2008 International Multidisciplinary Interface Research Congress (IMIRC) in Beijing during the Olympic Games ---> International Interface Research Centre (IIRC) ---> NCBP ---> World Programme on World Society Well Being and Quality of Life (WBQoL) ---> New Global Governance Infrastructure (NGGI) based on trust ---> Achieve and sustain the citizens’ WBQoL at interconnected personal, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels. The first two and most important steps (IMIRC and consequently IIRC) were blocked by two successive presidencies at the European Commission: the Barroso Team followed by the Juncker Team. Barroso replaced the IIRC by the much beleaguered EIT, a plagiarism (see The IIRC below). This created enormous problems because the IMIRC (a two week congress) was essential to engage in explaining/exploring the notion of interfaces to/with a highly diversified multicultural population from all possible backgrounds worldwide, paving the way to understanding the NCBP. The result being that the whole strategy was turned upside-down, a hell of a mess, delaying everything for now 14 years. Indeed, the NCBP remains difficult to understand. 

     The only option became to present the NCBP to the international community as if the IMIRC had already taken place and the IIRC already built. An extremely difficult task. Serendipity came my way when I received an invitation to give a lecture in Slovenia last 8 Novembre 2018 (https://info.delo.si/delove-podjetniske-zvezde/) on how to deal with the complexities of an ever changing world. The title of the lecture was “Neuroscience, complexity and developing the human potential” where the practical take away was precisely the New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP). The lecture - a holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary approach to today’s world crisis that is now being referred to as the “Slovenian” lecture - apparently succeeded this "tour de force" because the message that got through was: HOPE! A Solution Is Available! The result being that a world tour to promote the (NCBP) was (and still is) being considered. As for Slovenia, fees and expenses (travel and accommodation) must however be covered by each State/Institution: the NCBP is the result of 30 years’ work. Unfortunately, the UN+EU+WEF System created us difficulties and the world tour was delayed. In the meantime came Covid-19.

The NCBP blends together (to simplify) the Education of Tomorrow (Interface Education), the Governance of Tomorrow (Interface Governance), the Smart Cities of Tomorrow (Interface Localities), the Science of Tomorrow (Interface Science) and the Medicine of Tomorrow (Interface Medicine) into one: the Interface (cf the Interface Paradigm). Once the NCBP has been presented and explained to the world population, the NCBP shall be working on its InfoWeek (260 delegations expected) that shall prepare the first ever World Programme on World Society Well Being and Quality of Life where the deliverable shall be a tool that is so needed by everybody to facilitate coordinated multistakeholder collaboration worldwide, in other words a (NGGI) as mentioned above. The time is ripe to prepare the mindsets of citizens worldwide for a transition to New Global Governance (NGG) inviting coordinated collective citizen/institution collaboration on an equal footing with equal opportunities (happiness, food, water, shelter, education, job, research and innovation). We are faced with a global network of interconnected global challenges that can only be appropriately managed by first setting up a NGGI based on trust. This is becoming increasingly recognised and mainstream as the only way to guarantee a stable resilient political structure worldwide. (happiness, food, water, shelter, education, job, research and innovation). We are faced with a global network of interconnected global challenges that can only be appropriately managed by first setting up a NGGI based on trust. Hence the NCBP's enormous added value for both our civilisation and planet. The NCBP is attracting more European countries, the BRICS, USA, Latin America, Canada, Asia, Middle East, Africa and Oceania. 

ii. The NCBP Task Force 

     The NCBP is a world initiative that requires a Task Force for local, regional, national, continental and world coordination. This NCBP Task Force (that consists of at least one delegate per country plus his/her team) is being progressively set up. Citizens from all backgrounds and socio-economic status are welcome to apply. See NCBP Task Force: Open Call. The NCBP Task Force shall be eligible for funds once it is complete and fully operational.  Description and Rules have been published below. The NCBP Task Force Forum that contains useful practicl information and advice is only accessible to Members.

Description

The NCBP Task Force is the NCBP Power House consisting of 260 National NCBP Teams (one per country). Each National NCBP Team is a highly articulate interface between population and governance that facilitates achieving and sustaining the citizens' well-being and quality of life in their own country.

The NCBP Task Force monitors the whole NCBP from beginning to end:

1.       Promotion

2.       Logistics

3.       Supervision

4.       Fundraising  

There are basically four types of Tasks:

i. World Tour of the very successful Lecture I gave in Slovenia on “Neuroscience, Complexity and Developing the Human Potential” introducing and promoting the NCBP. 

ii. Set up World Network of National NCBP Task Forces

iii. First NCBP Summit = Counter WEF Summit 

iv. Monitoring the whole NCBP from beginning to end: the New Global Governance Infrastructure (NGGI) in place.  

The world is not going well. Despite receiving billions, the UN+EU+WEF System has never succeeded to sustainably either prevent or solve any of the fifty global challenges our civilisation has been faced with. The UN+EU+WEF System is inefficient, incompetent, arrogant and shockingly expensive to run which is why the NCBP is increasingly recognised as a viable alternative. It seems that the UN+EU+WEF System is not only unable to but doesn’t want to find a sustainable solution because it wouldn’t be needed anymore.  

Funding shall be available. A copy of the contract shall be given to each National NCBP Task Force leader/coordinator once her/his post is confirmed.

Rules

The NCBP Task Force Group Forum is exclusively devoted to:  

    > Setting up the World Network of National NCBP Task Forces (+/- 260)

    > Organising the First NCBP Summit (Counter WEF Summit)

    > NCBP Promotion

    > NCBP logistics and Public Relations

    > NCBP concerns

    > NCBP understanding

    > NCBP dissemination

    > World Programme on World Society Well Being and Quality of Life (Part I, Part II and Part III) that the NCBP is preparing  

The NCBP Task Force is NOT for political or philosophical discussions and intellectual entertainment.  

Application Procedure:  

The Admission Conditions and Selection Criteria must be read before sending in a joining request or accepting an invitation.  

Admission Conditions:  

i. 1rst Degree Connection

ii. Please send a joining request to the NCBP Task Force (Group). You may also receive an invitation to join the NCBP Task Force.

iii. Admission is always initially conditional. 

iv. Immediate evidence of active and sustained interest and participation in the Group is required following Conditional Admission.

v. Admission is confirmed following an assessment period of one week.

vi. Sustained interest and active participation in the Group is required to remain in the Group.

vii. Inactive members during a period of two weeks are deleted from the Group.

viii. Active interest can also just take the form of sponsoring and donations.  

Selection criteria:  

> Holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary potential

> Trustworthiness

> Honesty

> Reliability

> Resilience

> Courage  

Knowledge is not a criteria. Why? First, knowledge can be acquired. We are students all our lives, learning, unlearning, relearning all the time... Second, I feel that it is important to realise that all the knowledge that has been accumulated since the beginning of humanity has not prevented our civilisation from making a thorough mess of this world with no one knowing what to do! So there is a need to look elsewhere..  

The mindset IS a criteria. Why? The mindset (state of mind) is not only an interface that processes data, it also determines HOW this data is collected and processed therefore coming up with different conclusions based on similar or identical data. Finally, and perhaps the most important, the "HOW" can be constructive or destructive... The mindset is the interface that "decides" whether to turn divergences/differences into either constructive exchanges or destructive confrontations.  

Please note that trustworthiness is an extremely sensitive issue. Applicants who change their minds after sending in a joining request or accepting an invitation or who are in fact Trojan Horses must be aware that they shall be permanently deleted (blocked) from the group.

***

The first step is to give worldwide publicity/visibility to the NCBP and explain why such an initiative has become so urgent and important today. This is where the World Tour of the lecture I gave in Slovenia last Novembre 2018 comes in. There are two “ways” to give this lecture to the 260 or so countries worldwide: i. One after the other in series. This would take far too much time to complete..., or ii. One single lecture per cluster of countries: for example organisations can make arrangements so that the presentation is made before many countries at the same time, reducing expenses and saving an enormous amount of time and energy. This is under way. 

The NCBP World Consortium must remain vigilant because the NCBP has been and continues to be plagiarised by powerful unscrupulous opportunistic characters in all areas (institutions, academia, civil society, politicians, private/public sector) for their own politico-financial interests. 

                                                                       

iii. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)  

The so-called “UN” SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) are in fact a sophisticated transcription of the NCBP, so sophisticated that they have become unimplementable because no one excepting the academic elite seems to understand them. We suggest returning to the original, much simpler, more accessible and therefore more efficient. Please see: The Sustainable Development Goals: Reinventing The Wheel!  

There have therefore been two solutions circulating worldwide to improve the citizens’ welfare and create a sustainable planet:

     > The UN+EU+WEF System's solution - the SDGs - directly inspired from our work without the slightest recognition in complete violation of IPR and quite ineffective

     > The original NCBP solution increasingly recognised as the only viable alternative that is progressively overtaking the former. 

The very foundations of the "UN" SDGs and the EU SDG Multi-Stakeholder Platform are unhealthy because stolen; these initiatives have therefore no legitimacy. Consequently, they are not sustainable. 

It is also becoming increasingly clear that the UN et al (i.e. UNESCO, ...), OECD, NATO, EU, WTO, ... and other bureaucratic monsters are not appropriately configured to deal with the Third Millennium’s Top Priority which is achieving and sustaining the citizens’ well being and quality of life in world society. These different organisations/institutions are not sustainable as structured and must undergo a profound institutional architecture revolution to prepare the transition to New Global Governance (NGG). It is now time to explore how they can be constructively articulated together within a New Global Governance Infrastructure (NGGI) inviting coordinated collective citizen/institution collaboration on an equal footing with equal opportunities. 

iv. The World Economic Forum (WEF): The Great Reset & New World Order

Difference Between The WEF & The NCBP! 

     The WEF's Great Reset is directly inspired from and a twisted plagiarism of the NCBP's Mindset Reset that it has completely distorted and misused. The NCBP is the necessary fundamental mindset revolution (mindset reset), education revolution and governance revolution that our civilisation needs to achieve and sustain the well-being and quality of life of eight billion interconnected human beings at personnal, family, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels, in other words to understand and manage global complexity in an ever changing world. Both the NCBP and the WEF are interested in global governance. The essential difference is that the NCBP proposes a listening society based decentralised new global governance infrastructure with and not imposed on the world population whereas the WEF wishes to impose a coercive society based centralised global governance. The NCBP is concerned about achieving and sustaining the happiness of eight billion human beings. The WEF is concerned about world control and omnipotence. Common to both is a very powerful global governance tool provided by the NCBP. Behind a tool is a mindset that can be constructive or destructive. The NCBP uses the tool for constructive exchanges; the WEF uses the same tool for destructive confrontations. So the best way to neutralise the WEF is the original NCBP.

     > UN + EU + WEF = Hope or Danger? (More redirected links shall be published)

v. The World Covid-19 Crisis 

      Sarscov-2/Covid-19 and their pathophysiology are still far from being completely understood and the UN+EU+WEF System's forceful coercive propaganda imposing experimental gene therapy on the world population without its informed consent not to mention the intimidation, denigration, blackmail, slander and threats to anyone (including respected scientists and physicians) who dared question the Official Narrative's own imposed understanding and treatment, even losing their jobs, was/is despicable. The UN+EU+WEF System is responsible for having created the worst pandemic of all times: the loss of trust, with disastrous short/medium/long term consequences. Shame on YOU! YOU have created profound worldwide discord. YOU shall have to be held accountable to the world citizens.

    > World Covid-19 Crisis 2021: Plan B

     > Covid-19: Open Global Call (CWIN 10) 

     > The Covid-19 Pandemic

     > The Covid-19 Disaster: It All Fits In!

vi. The Future 

     > The World Needs A New Leader

     > Candidate for the EC Presidency 2024

vii. Funding 

     > IMNRC & NCBP International Support. Open Call.

     > Just Three Million Euros Needed To Save Our Civilisation

     > Open Call For Funding

---> The NCBP involves eight billion interconnected human beings since everybody is concerned. The NCBP is open to public/private partnerships, venture capitalists, investors, sponsors, philanthropists. The World tour of the “Slovenian” lecture: fees and expenses (travel and accommodation) must be settled by the host country (private/public sector). Each national delegation is funded by its own national public/private sectors. The NCBP Task Force (all the 260 delegations) is therefore funded by a contribution from each participating country. However the global coordination and logistics is monitored from the IMNRC’s HQ in Belgium. This requires direct international funding.

 

2.  Interface Education (Education of Tomorrow)

From Unidisciplinary Excellence to Holistic Multicultural Integrated Interdisciplinary Competence

     Our Planet Earth and civilisation are faced with problems that have reached such a level of complexity as to become unmanageable. The State of Mind (mindset) determines the way you process – collect, assimilate, understand, articulate – data together, whatever the data. There is therefore a need to optimise the State of Mind (mindset) for complex avant-garde holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing for constructive exchanges instead of destructive confrontations.

1. Standard Interface Education.

> Bachelor in Interfaces (B.I.): 1 term course.

     > Master in Interfaces (M.I.): 1 year course.  

Registration is open

> Doctorate in Interfaces (D.I.): 1-3 years (depends on entrance assessment)

The D.I. shall be delivered by the International Interface Research Centre (IIRC) pending the Interface Assimilation Programme (IAP), a highly advanced cognitive NNIVEE programme that requires advanced brain imagery.  

> Summer Courses

Summer Courses in June-July-August are organised. These offer an excellent general introduction to the more advanced Master in Interfaces that follows. Please visit Master in Interfaces.

2. Automated Interface Education: Customised Interactive Software (CIS).

There shall never be enough schools/universities to train soon 10 billion human beings on this Planet. Furthermore, sending your child to a school/university is no guarantee that she/he shall come out competent: good pedagogues are a rare species...  CIS combines the two challenges by adapting the material to be assimilated to the student’s own understanding grid from scratch to professional competence short-circuiting the university entirely. A formidable interactive educational tool that shall replace schools/universities altogether in the medium/long term. Top/standard World Universities shall be replaced by top/standard World CIS. The status of schools and universities shall change. They shall still be useful for practical applications and as brainstorming hubs, but as structured today, they shall disappear.

     There are two types of CIS:

i. Unidisciplinary CIS. Unidisciplinary can be strictly unidisciplinary but not necessarily (eg. cell biology).

ii. Holistic Integrated Interdisciplinary CIS. Research ongoing but still science fiction at the present time.  

Needless to mention the considerable pressure against the worldwide development of such software by the existing educational systems for obvious reasons.

--- > Interface Education (EdoT) is looking for software engineers, experts in digital technology and AI, professors/teachers/students interested in all the fields taught in schools/universities today, specialists in brain imaging. We are open to private/public partnerships, venture capitalists, investors, sponsors, philanthropists

 

3. Interface Governance. (Governance of Tomorrow)

New Global Governance = Interface Governance = Holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary governance, inviting coordinated collective citizen/institution collaboration on an equal footing with equal opportunities. This is the deliverable of the World Programme on World Society Well Being and Quality of Life monitored by the NCBP.

The GovoT requires a New Global Governance Infrastructure based on trust. This is the NIM (National Interface Ministry) Network which comes at the end of Part III of the World Programme on World Society Well Being and Quality of Life. The NIM Network is therefore the practical tool to achieve and sustain the citizens' well being and quality of life at local, regional, national, continental and world levels.

The kick off in each country is the "Slovenian" lecture. The latter is essential because it explains how to proceed practically by giving the global picture, a clear holistic overview of both the World Programme and the NCBP, and how it works. The details shall be explained during the NCBP InfoWeek. 

The chronology of events that shall make GovoT possible can therefore be presented thus:

i. Presentation of the “Slovenian” lecture in each country in collaboration with the media so that all the citizens in a given country are informed. 

ii. Organising and presenting the NCBP InfoWeek.

iii. Preparing Part I of the World Programme for World Society Well Being and Quality of Life = one national definition of well being and quality of life /country + one national standard methodology for National Society Well Being and Quality of Life Profile Assessment / country --- > Part I --- > Part I deliverable = world consensus for a highly articulate definition of well being and quality of life applicable to all nations and standard methodology for national society well being and quality of life profile assessment applicable to all nations.

iv. Preparing Part II of the World Programme for World Society Well Being and Quality of Life = Create one National Society Well Being and Quality of Life Profile/country --- > Part II --- > Part II deliverable = platform where the international referential is world society well being and quality of life

v. Preparing Part III of the World Programme for World Society Well Being and Quality of Life = NIM --- > Part III --- > Part III deliverable = NIM Network = NGGI

vi. NGGI provides the infrastructure for Interface Governance --- > Proceed to achieve and sustain the Citizens’ well being and quality of life at local, regional, national, continental and World levels, i.e. in World Society.

The whole endeavour is organised and monitored by the NCBP Task Force. Please visit the New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP) Task Force on LinkedIn.

--- > Interface Governance (GovoT): call for global interactive participation of citizens from all backgrounds, culture, religion, socio-economic status, institutions, academia, politicians, artists, civil society, ...
 

4. Interface Localities. (The Smart Cities of Tomorrow: World Network of Happy Localities: CWIN 11 - World Network of Happy Localities Consortium vs The EU/UN System. - Pilot Scheme 1 (PS 1) Programme on Happy Localities - CWIN 11)  

Since the Third Millennium’s top priority is achieving and sustaining the citizens’ well being and quality of life at local (rural area, village, town, city), regional, national, continental and world levels, the finality of a local project should after all be to achieve and sustain the citizens’ happiness in that locality, region, nation, continent and planet since everything is interconnected and affects the other. The first step therefore is to identify the "Unhappy Localities". Once this diagnosis has been established, the next step is understanding why? What is going wrong in that locality? The aetiology of unhappiness is more often than not multifactorial. After realising that a locality is in fact a complex network of interacting networks of tangible and intangible components that together not only makes up its miniature world but also directly affects the ill/well being and quality of life of the inhabitants, you need to identify and disentangle these networks bearing in mind that they are all interconnected. Key to this process for optimal customised treatment is listening and talking to all the locality's inhabitants, listening to their interests, concerns, hopes and solutions, thereby creating an interactive dialogue. 

In so doing, citizens shall become better informed, less apprehensive regarding the unknown and more open to innovative solutions that shall stand a much better chance of corresponding to their needs, of social acceptance. The quality of the consultation shall determine the quality of the aetiological diagnosis that shall in turn pave the way to the most appropriate treatment, assuming there is one... To our mind, therefore, the challenge is treating an unhappy locality to turn it into a happy locality, "smart" or not. Some don't want/need technology to be happy. Others have the technology and the latest gadget, but feel miserable. 

Assessing a locality's happiness or well being and quality of life, in other words creating a local society well being and quality of life profile, is a very complex and painstakingly slow process. Indeed, you first need a world consensus on a definition of happiness that can be applied everywhere followed by a world consensus on a standard methodology for society well being and quality of life profile assessment. And this is only the beginning... Considering the multitude of localities worldwide and the desperately slow pace at which everything is going now (small clusters of localities one after the other) we shall need generations to see any concrete impact on the citizens' well being and quality of life, and by that time, our civilisation may have perished. There is therefore a need to set up a highly articulate methodology that can establish an aetiological diagnosis for any locality anywhere in the world in record time. In other words, a Local Diagnostics Unit (LDU) must be created.    

This is our Pilot Scheme 1 Programme on Happy Localities - that is embedded in the New Capacity Building Programme (NCBP) - a holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary approach to interconnected localities, regions, nations, continents and the world that considers the locality, region, nation, continent, world as a patient...  

The IMNRC needs to organise another international High Level Workshop on Localities that shall be devoted to Pilot Scheme 1 on Smart (i.e. Happy) Localities exclusively focussing on Methodology. The previous one took place in 2019.

--- > Interface Localities (SmCitoT) . We are looking for all stakeholders interested in Smart Cities from different perspectives. This includes researchers, academics, politicians, civil society, public/private partnerships, venture capitalists, investors, sponsors, philanthropists.  

5. Interface Science. (The Science of Tomorrow). 

     Science comes from the latin 'scire': know. What is the finality of knowledge? Knowledge is a double-edged sword depending on how it is used. The mindset behind this knowledge can be constructive or destructive. Science/knowledge must bow to the citizens' well being and quality of life; not the other way round. How can the huge amount of data that is increasing exponentially benefit eight billion human beings? 

     This said, what do we 'know' exactly? How do we 'know'? Through what process do we 'know'? How do we understand what we see, hear, read, taste, feel, think? Is what we 'know' understood? How much of what we do 'know' is not understood? These are essential questions and concerns at the heart of science and research. There are still far too many unknowns. 

     Clearly, our understanding of what goes on in and around us depends on the 'understanding' interface, the mindset/state of mind which is in fact the NNIVEEE interface that transduces 'data' into what we consider consciously or unconsciously as 'meaningful information'. The problem is that education has created fragmented human beings, fragmented minds, fragmented mentalities artificially yet convincingly disconnecting the interconnected. Education (as we have created it so far) is therefore in fact toxic for our civilisation and planet. Education has provided - and is still providing unfortunately - unidisciplinary excellence bathing in a sea of holistic integrated interdisciplinary incompetence. THE recurrent problem today is indeed the increasing fragmentation and our helplessness to constructively articulate these fragments together. 

     Our approach to science, the way research is undertaken, is dependent on our education. But a fragmented education does not appropriately configure the mindset for a holistic understanding of everyday life and the universe. To innovate, you first need to innovate education. Science alone shall not save the world. Culture alone shall not save the world. Interdisciplinarity might. Global holistic integrated interdisciplinarity should... provided that there is an adequate referential or convergence point like achieving and sustaining the citizens' wellbeing and quality of life at interconnected personal, interpersonal, neighbourhood, local, regional, national, continental and world levels. The problem with interdisciplinarity is its assimilation. It is not that our brain can't; it is because of an obsolete outdated educational system that is still mainstream because of powerful politico-financial vested interests. A fundamental education revolution is needed. 

     'Science' is an interface just like 'music', 'food', 'medicine', 'constitution', 'politics', 'well-being', 'ill-being', 'environment', 'biodiversity', 'quasars', 'cosmos', 'Higg's boson', 'virus', ... All are 'interfaces'. 

     'Science' is therefore just an interface interconnected to, in fact embedded in, other interfaces. A degree - assuming that it is deserved which is not always the case - does not automatically mean competence. Demonstrated proficiency in a restricted branch whilst feeling completely out of your depth when trying to deal with the vast expanse of data that lies both within and outside you, would you consider this 'competence'? Competence today needs to be redefined. Indeed, from this holistic perspective, a skill ceases to be a skill...and a human being is perhaps something more than a 'skill' I would think. 

     All these terms - science, music, dancing, arts, maths, food, ... - shall soon be blended into one term: interfaces. We shall be studying, practising, exchanging interfaces. Period. 

     --- > The Science of Tomorrow section above is necessarily blended with the other sections in this brochure. 

6. Interface Medicine. The Medicine of Tomorrow.

Medical training in Medical Schools does not enable an understanding of the holistic complexity of medicine and of the patient. Courses are still far too fragmented and disconnected not to mention the chronic lack of good pedagogues.

        i. Nutri-neuro-immuno-vasculo-endocrino-epigenetics (NNIVEE) & The Microbiome. A Holistic approach to medicine and the patient.
 
By applying the principles of one of our medical EoI [The physics of life and the “NNIVEE” system: an integrated interdisciplinary understanding of diseases and healing potential in the human being explored using novel approaches to therapy] and launching one of our first CWINs (Customised World Interdisciplinary Network for Bladder Cancer (CWIN 4-1 see below), we (a small team I directed at the Clinic St. Jean in Brussels between 2007 and 2010) were able to not only develop an innovative and successful treatment for invasive bladder cancer in the elderly that waived the need for radical cystectomy and/or six week intensive radiotherapy but also a successful innovative global revalidation programme for neurodegenerative diseases.

The whole protocol is published on our website since 2010 (open access) and offers many interesting avenues for both research and less expensive equally efficient treatment alternatives for the developing countries in cancer, both non and communicable diseases and long distance space flight.

     ii. InfoDiagnosis

InfoDiagnosis - www.infodiagnosis.com - is our medical information/diagnostics/training website for the general public, medical students and accomplished physicians. Very successful among the English speaking community . 

iii. Medical Education – Medical Schools

Medical Education in medical schools does not enable an understanding of the complexity of medicine nor does it prepare the medical student for a holistic approach to the patient. Medical courses are still far too fragmented and disconnected not to mention the chronic lack of good pedagogues.  As an introduction to a holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary approach to the patient and medicine, I would like to Introduce NNIVEE in Medical Schools. Open to offers. [NB. This is in fact Interface Education applied to Medicine].

--- > Medicine: 

i.   We would like to introduce NNIVEE as an advanced course in Holistic Medicine for both both medical interns and accomplished physicians in Medical Schools to promote a holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary approach to the patient. I am open to offers for both research and medical training reform. I have already been invited to the Czech Republic to give a lecture on NNIVEEE and have recently been invited to apply for a professorship in the US; 

ii.  We would also like to go ahead with a cohort study for our innovative and successful treatment of invasive bladder cancer in the elderly, the objective being its official recognition as an alternative to EBM. 

iii. I would like to launch a national or international project on the Intestinal Microbiota and NNIVEE (focusing on colorectal cancer and Alzheimer's Disease to begin with). 

7. The Interface Diagnostics Cabinet (IDC): interface approach to specific complex challenges.

The issues we are faced with today have reached such a level of complexity that citizens (experts, academics, politicians, ...) are getting completely out of their depth. Why? Because they are faced with holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenges something that their education has not prepared them for. The existing educational system is not sufficiently powerful to enable us to deal with the complexities of the challenges we are faced with.

Citizens, Institutions, Organisations, Governments thus have two options:

i. Acquire the mindset that is needed to deal with complexity by following our Bachelor and Master in Interfaces (MI) followed by our Doctorate in Interface (DI), or

ii. Apply to our Interface Diagnostics Cabinet

--- > IDC: Consultation takes place at the IMNRC administrative and residential HQ in Tervuren, near Brussels, Belgium. By appointment only (e-mail).

8. The Customised World Interdisciplinary Networks (CWINs).

CWINs are World Calls for assistance. They are addressed to all citizens worldwide – an open call – for their ideas/suggestions/know-how (all nominally recognised by default to prevent their misappropriation by unscrupulous opportunists) when someone is faced with a still unresolved challenge that hence would benefit from the added value of worldwide collaboration and assistance. This was the case for CWIN 4-1 that paved the way for our innovative and successful invasive bladder cancer treatment and global revalidation programme I just mentioned.

These CWINs have unsurpassed potential to tackle the most complex challenges that are facing us today. The CWINs would enormously benefit from a NGGI based on trust.

--- > CWINS: call for any outstanding issues that have a direct bearing on the citizen’s or society’s well being and quality of life. These would benefit from a CWIN.

9. The International Multidisciplinary Interface Research Congress (IMIRC) The webpage shall be progressively updated.

A two week congress devoted to exploring what could “be” an “interface”. 

     The IMIRC should have been held in Beijing during the 2008 Olympic Games as planned with Chinese colleagues at the time. This was blocked by the Barroso Team at the European Commission. The basic IMIRC Programme is still very actual: only its knowledge base needs to be updated. Indeed, we still don't "know" what the deuce could be an "interface"... and we still don't understand how the brain "understands"...let alone an interface. 

     I was invited to Haiku a few years ago by an important Chinse Official to discuss the NCBP but the Junker Team at the European Commission prevented me from going to China. I guess the EC didn't want the NCBP to take over. 

--- > IMIRC: we would like to hold this congress somewhere. Any suggestions? The “interface” continues to fascinate many yet remains difficult to understand. The IMIRC is still needed. Some fundamental concepts introduced in the NCBP stem from “interfaces”.

10. The International Interface Research Centre (IIRC). 

The IIRC is the NCBP's technological partner.

     A highly advanced futuristic training, research and education centre, the IIRC is the IMNRC's successor and shall deliver the Doctorate in Interfaces (D.I.) fully optimising the state of mind for complex avant-garde holistic multicultural integrated interdisciplinary challenge processing in an ever changing world. This - as explained elsewhere - is the Interface Mindset. The IIRC integrates the infinitesimally small with the infinitesimally large in its very approach to research whatever the field. 

     The IIRC's own Flagship Programme - the Interface Assimilation Programme (IAP) - shall rely on an advanced cognitive neuroscience protocol that explores how the brain 'understands'. But since cognitive neuroscience is necessarily embedded in the NNIVEEE System, this shall also mean exploring the mind boggling complexities of NNIVEEE under healthy and pathological conditions bringing in personalised medicine and pharmacogenomics into the equation when necessary. 

     The IIRC shall also be in charge of creating and developing both the unidisciplinary and holistic interdisciplinary CIS mentioned above.

The idea behind the IIRC was to be presented in 2008 at the end of the IMIRC that was blocked by the Barroso Team at the European Commission who replaced the IIRC by the EIT. See The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT): a Shocking Case of Plagiarism

--- > IIRC: The actual location of the first Pilot IIRC needs to be discussed with government, financial, academic and civil society stakeholders. PPPs are welcome. A completely new building is not absolutely necessary. Renovating/refurbishing an existing building is perfectly acceptable. 

B. Funds

The following links give an overview of the funding campaign:

> IMNRC & NCBP International Support. Open Call.

> Just Three Million Euros Needed To Save Our Civilisation

> Open Call For Funding

C. Publications:

© Copyright 2023 - 2022 - 2021 - 2020 - 2019 - 2018 - 2017 - 2016 - 2015 - 2014 - 2013 - 2012 - 2011 - 2010 - 2009 - 2008 - 2007 - 2006 - 2005 - 2004 - 2003 - 2002 
 

Contact Us!

Professor Vivian R. F. Linssen D.I.

Founding Executive Director

International Multidisciplinary Neuroscience Research Center a.s.b.l./v.z.w.

Principal Coordinator

NewPOL Consortium Network

Jesus-Eiklaan 120

BE-3080 Tervuren

BELGIUM

Tel/Fax: +3227681730  

Twitter: @VivianLinssen

e-mail 1: vivian.linssen@imnrc.org   

e-mail 2: viv@infodiagnosis.com

url 1: www.imnrc.org (Draft)

url 2: www.infodiagnosis.com   

LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/professor-vivian-r-f-linssen-d-i-633858230/

Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/vivian.linssen

**************************************************************************